How Muslims all over the World kiss Arab shoes

Author: Cherson

Do you know that Algeria was not originally Arabic? If you ask the average Westerner or even an average Muslim, they would most probably answer that it has always been Arabic. But Algeria is a Berber country historically. So too is Morocco, Libya, Tunisia, Niger and Mauritania. The Berber peoples were dispossessed of their lands and forced to convert to Islam.

Iran is not Arabic, either. It’s former Persia. Who wants to know: King Cyrus the Great was Persian. As well as Darius I. And Persia’s contribution to the world civilization was times bigger than the contribution of Arabs.

Pakistan is just a part of India with Muslim majority; it is not Arabic, either.

Indonesia is whatever you want, except being Arabic.

Kosovo is NOT Arabic, and the republics of Central Asia, like Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan are not Arabic.

So, the majority of Islamic world is NOT ARABIC.

But, for some “strange “reasons, ALL THE PROBLEMS OF ISLAMIC WORLD TURN OUT TO BE THOSE WHICH SERVE THE INTERESTS OF ARABS.

In Kosovo the civil war was raging for almost 4 years. I do not like Islam, but let’s be objective; most of the victims in this war were Muslims. At last, Kosovo got the independence. What Islamic countries recognized it? Only Turkey, Afghanistan and Malaysia recognized it.

And Arab countries? They, of course, rushed to support the newly formed country with Islamic majority and were, no doubt, among the first to recognize it?

No. Not a single Arab country recognized the independence of Kosovo.

What are the main themes of the international crises in the world news? Look at the headlines; they ALL concern Arabs in some way.

At many European and American universities you can see posters and graffiti like “Free Palestine!” and “End the Israeli Occupation!” Students from Islamic countries (supported by some leftist groups) marched against the Israeli war against Hezbollah. But why does no one ever march for Darfur? Or the African students are more preoccupied about how the enraged Israeli farmers shot a couple of belonging to Arabs cows – than about how their mothers and sisters are being raped and killed by Muslims in Darfur?

When North Korea threatened South Korea with war, why did no one march in support of South Korea or spray graffiti to say “Free North Korea!”? Or the students of Indonesia and Malaysia are more worried by the fact that Israel and Palestine Authority are not good neighbors - than by the fact that nuclear totalitarian and aggressive North Korea is so close to them?

Looks like as if Muslims all over the world were more interested in fighting the Arabs’ struggles than they are in fighting their own struggles in their own parts of the world.

During the civil war in Sri Lanka, many Muslims were killed by both the Buddhist government and the Tamil Tigers. The Sinhalese government attempted to mobilize the Muslim population to fight against the Tamils. What was the reaction of Arab countries? To put it clear; the Arab countries DID NOT GIVE A DAMN about what happened to the Sri Lankan Muslims. And if this also happened in Lebanon or Palestine? Oh, in THIS case all Arab governments would immediately take sides and demand of Muslims all over the world to support them in the “just struggle”.

What is Palestine to a Muslim who lives in Indonesia and often has a very vague idea about where this “Palestine” is and what it should be eaten with? Honestly, it means nothing to him. But for Arabs it’s very important that he support the “just struggle of the Palestinian people”, fighting thus for the interests of Arabs and often putting in jeopardy his OWN interests and the interests of HIS country.

Arab world is only a part of Islamic world. It’s a subsystem within a bigger system. And what we see is how the small subsystem says to the whole system: YOU MUST WORK AND FIGHT FOR ME:

And the System - millions of Muslims from Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Northern Africa, and Iran - says: Yes, darling, anything you want, only you feel good.

Arabs are the Bosses in Islamic world.

And what is the role of Islam in this Arab hegemony? Oh, it’s extremely important. Islam works day and night to the advantage of Arab governments. Islam allows Arab governments to command fifth columns in other nations to work for their goals. Muslims across the world see it as their moral duty to support Palestine and to hate Jews, when it is really the mere self-interest of the Arab nations.

But what makes this Arab hegemony especially cynical is the fact that the Arab government elites do not even believe in Islam. The House of Saud engages in gambling and consumption of alcohol, and sends their children to Western universities. Qaddafi made several public criticisms of Islam in his early years but later reverted to the image of a “pious Muslim”, ha ha.

This suggests that Arab governments are going to fight every inch of the way to keep Islam strong, for THEIR VITAL INTERESTS DEPEND ON IT.

As usual, the “wit kids”-the Arabs-use the dumb masses of Muslims all over the world to serve the Arab interests.

Maybe it’s time for Muslims from Pakistan to understand that the Arabs would never support them against India, no matter how strong the Pakistanis will support Arabs in Palestine? And maybe it’s time for Iran to recall that it used to be one of the greatest nations of the world-until Muslims arrived with Quran in one hand and sable in another?

Faithfreedom.org

Dogma of Halal and Haram

By: Jahanshah Rashidian

If you walk at random in any Muslim district in Europe, you will certainly find somewhere, at least in one corner, an Islamic butchery with the word ”halal” written on its shop-window. For the products of meat, the word “halal” is a badge of Islamic quality.

Muslims believe that since blood is not ritually a pure substance, slaughter is necessary to inhibit the thorough draining of all of the animal's blood.
Furthermore, the verse” Bismillah al Rahman Al Rahim”, in the name of Allah the Beneficent the Merciful, is necessary to render the meat halal or lawful to eat.

The word halal refers, here, to meat killed and prepared in line with Islamic dietary laws. Jewish and Islamic religions demand that slaughter is carried out with a cut to the neck or throat, rather than the more widespread method of stunning with a bolt into the head before slaughter.

Generally, halal means anything permissible under Islamic law, in contrast to haram, that which is forbidden. This includes behaviour, speech, dress, conduct. The term halal is also used to judge the right of sexuality after marriage, even temporarily marriage which is a Shiite tradition called “Sigheh” which is believed by some as a legalised prostitution. To rape his own female slave or even a non Muslim prisoner of war is halal—in this light, many political female prisoners of the Islamic Republic of Iran who were considered “non-Muslims”, were ”legally” raped by their Islamist torturers before being executed.

In an extended sense, halal means fairness of business dealings or other types of transaction or activity. Therefore, it represents values that are held in high regard by Muslims. It contains standards for social norms, morals, foods and other services that meet Islamic regulations. Needless to mention, in Islamic countries, these are the only available standards for Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

Slaughter is an old tradition of Jewish and Islamic clan society. As a matter of best practice, the killed animal is supposed to be distributed among the members of the clan right after being slaughtered so that each family can often have fresh meat to eat. Like many other traditions, this one was also accepted as a principle in Islam.

Slaughter reminds us of an old instinct of pre-historic hominoid, to which a prey must be killed by the hunter—the instinct can be seen by a great number of beasts of prey. In another perspective, we see a characteristic disposition of this instinct beyond Islamic laws (Sharia), where beheading and amputation of the accused resemble routine rituals, where blood of the accused is figuratively considered as halal and the executer does a halal job.

Halal blood can be also a reason for honour killing in the Islamic societies. Honour killing is committed by male family members against female family members, who are perceived to have brought dishonour upon the family. A female can be targeted by her family for a variety of reasons, including: refusing to enter into an arranged marriage, having sex outside marriage, or even being the victim of a sexual assault.

Halal has nothing to do with prophylactic, hygienic, precautions or medical meaning. To better understand halal, we must see what its opposite term “haram” means. Haram has roots in revulsion which is an old instinct of evolution. Revulsion is a sense of loathing without any logical reason or clear explanation. As an instinct, it was a necessary reaction of early human beings when exposed to an unknown food, unknown object, or an unconventional situation.

Object of revulsion is culturally conditioned. It means whatever is repulsive for the members of a given society do not necessarily provoke the same revulsion for others. In a historic sense, the terms like halal, haram and negis are nothing but the instinctive reflections, which were integrated into Islam.

In many cases, Islamic commandments and rituals are not only the traditional reflections of desert dwellers of pre-Islamic Arabia, but also based on the Prophet Muhammad’s habits, his sexual preferences, his favourite things, and his dietary habits.

Since sexuality is taboo in Islam, sexual organs, vaginal secretion and sperm are considered as “negis” (loathing and impure). Therefore, they should not be touched. Blood and any slimy substance secreted by a mucous membrane of the body have more or less a similar sense of negis. Needless to mention, all these secreted or mucous substances, regardless of their odour and colour, belong to normal function of our body.

Not only non Muslims, ethnic groups, slaves and women, but even animals in Islam are not freed from this discrimination. Dogs and pigs are the most negis animals. Term of “negis” characterises their absolute and unchangeable impurity. Pork meat is absolutely haram and dog as a “negis” animal can never be proper pet in a Muslim house. Touching a dog, especially a dog’s saliva, requires ritually hygienic procedure to get the hand clean—if a dog eats from a dish, the dish must be washed 7 times, the first time with sand. Dog, despite all its uses in many ways, is discriminated as a negis creature.

While Marriage of Muslim men with women of the Book (Muslims, Christians and Jews), based on Islamic rituals, can be permitted, all other varieties of marriage between Muslim women and non Muslim men are considered haram. As a patriarchal religion, Islam granted a little concession only to Muslim men. Muslim women are not allowed to marry men outside of Islam (unless they convert to Islam). No marriage is permitted between Muslims and “Mushriks” (atheists, polytheists, other belief systems which are considered by Muslims negis). The Koran says, “A believing slave woman is better than a mushrik woman”!

As mentioned, terms like halal, haram, and negis are not more than rituals of particular conditions and environment. These terms have no logic and scientific credentials at all. They are only the legacy of per-Islamic values of the Arabian clan- society which still impose themselves on today’s society.
Faithfreedom.org